Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs PhotoPills
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$180.0K/mo
~$2.16M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills S.L.
App Store
$35.5K/mo
~$426.0K/yr · 121K installs
Revenue winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+407% vs other
Installs winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+1395% vs other
MAU winner
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters wins
+1357% vs other
Rating winner
PhotoPills wins
+8% vs other
Why Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns roughly 5× more per month than PhotoPills - $180.0K vs $35.5K.
- Subscription model. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; PhotoPills relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters has ~1.8M lifetime installs vs PhotoPills's ~121K - 14.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$180.0K
◀
$35.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.16M
◀
$426.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
121K
Monthly active users (est.)?
558K
◀
38K
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.71★
Total ratings
16K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Mar 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 51.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.13.25
- Languages
- Catalan, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +3 more
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or PhotoPills? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $180.0K per month, while PhotoPills earns about $35.5K. That is a 5.1× revenue gap (~$144.5K more per month for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.16M/year, PhotoPills ≈ $426.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or PhotoPills? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 121K for PhotoPills - a 14.9× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and PhotoPills in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and PhotoPills offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. PhotoPills: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, PhotoPills 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $180.0K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $35.5K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or PhotoPills to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.