CapCut: Photo & Video Editor vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor
Bytedance Pte. Ltd
App Store
$11.01M/mo
~$132.14M/yr · 188.2M installs
VS
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$173.8K/mo
~$2.09M/yr · 1.7M installs
Revenue winner
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor wins
+6235% vs other
Installs winner
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor wins
+10656% vs other
MAU winner
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor wins
+10865% vs other
Rating winner
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor wins
+6% vs other
Why CapCut: Photo & Video Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- CapCut: Photo & Video Editor earns roughly 63× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $11.01M vs $173.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. CapCut: Photo & Video Editor undercuts at $7.99/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. CapCut: Photo & Video Editor has ~188.2M lifetime installs vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's ~1.7M - 107.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. CapCut: Photo & Video Editor runs 6 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CapCut: Photo & Video Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$11.01M
◀
$173.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$132.14M
◀
$2.09M
Lifetime installs (est.)
188.2M
◀
1.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
59.1M
◀
539K
App Store rating
4.62★
◀
4.34★
Total ratings
1.1M
◀
16K
US grossing rank
#23
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 14, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 730.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 17.6.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, Hebrew, Indonesian, Italian +14 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- 108.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.8.3
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor trajectory
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CapCut: Photo & Video Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor earns about $11.01M per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $173.8K. That is a 63.4× revenue gap (~$10.84M more per month for CapCut: Photo & Video Editor). Annual revenue: CapCut: Photo & Video Editor ≈ $132.14M/year, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.09M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CapCut: Photo & Video Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor leads with about 188.2M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - a 107.6× gap. CapCut: Photo & Video Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 1.1M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are CapCut: Photo & Video Editor and Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CapCut: Photo & Video Editor and Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters offer? v
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. CapCut: Photo & Video Editor runs a "Subscription (~$7.50/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #23" monetization model; Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CapCut: Photo & Video Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
CapCut: Photo & Video Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: CapCut: Photo & Video Editor 1.1M ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CapCut: Photo & Video Editor vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $11.01M for CapCut: Photo & Video Editor and $173.8K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CapCut: Photo & Video Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
