Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs WatchPAT

Cronometer: Calorie Counter

Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS

WatchPAT

Itamar Medical
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 821K installs
Revenue winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +46461700% vs other
Installs winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +564% vs other
MAU winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +437% vs other
Rating winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +30% vs other

Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 464617× more per month than WatchPAT - $464.6K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a $16.40/mo subscription that compounds; WatchPAT relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs WatchPAT's ~821K - 6.6× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Cronometer: Calorie Counter sits at 4.63★ vs 3.55★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
WatchPAT
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$464.6K
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.58M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
821K
Monthly active users (est.)?
785K
146K
App Store rating
4.63★
3.55★
Total ratings
53K
925
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.40
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Cronometer: Calorie Counter

Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 13, 2016
Last updated
Apr 28, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report →

WatchPAT

Itamar Medical
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 29, 2019
Last updated
Oct 26, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.2.0
Languages
-
View full WatchPAT report →

Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

WatchPAT trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while WatchPAT earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$464.6K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year, WatchPAT ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 821K for WatchPAT - a 6.6× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. WatchPAT reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and WatchPAT in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and WatchPAT offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. WatchPAT: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; WatchPAT runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings, WatchPAT 457 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs WatchPAT revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $0 for WatchPAT are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or WatchPAT to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.