Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc
App Store
$508.7K/mo
~$6.10M/yr · 3.3M installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 356.3M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+50867200% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+10757% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+1131% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+38% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 508672× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $508.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a $10.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. Cronometer: Calorie Counter sits at 4.77★ vs 3.45★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$508.7K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$6.10M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.3M
▶
356.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
955K
▶
11.8M
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
3.45★
Total ratings
94K
▶
682K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 9, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 151.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.57.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $508.7K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$508.7K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $6.10M/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 356.3M estimated downloads vs 3.3M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 108.6× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 94K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$10.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 94K ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $508.7K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.