Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc
App Store
$508.8K/mo
~$6.11M/yr · 3.3M installs
VS
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Giga Studios, Inc
App Store
$211.7K/mo
~$2.54M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+140% vs other
Installs winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+32% vs other
MAU winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+18% vs other
Rating winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 2× more per month than Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner - $508.8K vs $211.7K.
- Premium pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter charges $10.99/mo vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's $7.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$508.8K
◀
$211.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$6.11M
◀
$2.54M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.3M
▶
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
955K
▶
1.1M
App Store rating
4.77★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
94K
◀
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.99
◀
$7.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
6 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 9, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 151.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.57.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 174.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.17.2
- Languages
- English
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $508.8K per month, while Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $211.7K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$297.1K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $6.11M/year, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $2.54M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 3.3M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 1.3× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 94K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 39K ratings.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$10.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 94K ratings, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner 39K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $508.8K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $211.7K for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.