Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs PhotoPills
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$2.12M/mo
~$25.49M/yr · 16.0M installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills S.L.
App Store
$35.0K/mo
~$420.3K/yr · 120K installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+5965% vs other
Installs winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+13257% vs other
MAU winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+13299% vs other
Rating winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+1% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns roughly 61× more per month than PhotoPills - $2.12M vs $35.0K.
- Subscription model. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a $12.99/mo subscription that compounds; PhotoPills relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera has ~16.0M lifetime installs vs PhotoPills's ~120K - 133.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.12M
◀
$35.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$25.49M
◀
$420.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.0M
◀
120K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.1M
◀
38K
App Store rating
4.75★
◀
4.70★
Total ratings
106K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 138.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Mar 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 51.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.13.25
- Languages
- Catalan, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +3 more
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PhotoPills? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $2.12M per month, while PhotoPills earns about $35.0K. That is a 60.7× revenue gap (~$2.09M more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $25.49M/year, PhotoPills ≈ $420.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PhotoPills? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.0M estimated downloads vs 120K for PhotoPills - a 133.6× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 106K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and PhotoPills in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and PhotoPills offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. PhotoPills: no IAP detected on the public listing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PhotoPills? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 106K ratings, PhotoPills 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.12M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $35.0K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PhotoPills to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.