Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs YouTube

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera

DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.64M/mo
~$19.72M/yr · 16.5M installs
VS

YouTube

Google
App Store
$381.33M/mo
~$4.58B/yr · 5.0B installs
Revenue winner YouTube wins +23109% vs other
Installs winner YouTube wins +30272% vs other
MAU winner YouTube wins +68811% vs other
Rating winner Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins +2% vs other

Why YouTube is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. YouTube earns roughly 232× more per month than Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - $381.33M vs $1.64M.
  2. Premium pricing. YouTube charges $20.99/mo vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's $12.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. YouTube has ~5.0B lifetime installs vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's ~16.5M - 303.7× the funnel top.
  4. Charts placement. YouTube ranks #2 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full YouTube report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.64M
$381.33M
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.72M
$4.58B
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.5M
5.0B
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
2.7B
App Store rating
4.75★
4.67★
Total ratings
110K
47.9M
US grossing rank
-
#2
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
$20.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
4 tiers

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera

DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Aug 17, 2018
Last updated
Jun 8, 2026
File size
138.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.17.3
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
View full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report →

YouTube

Google
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Sep 11, 2012
Last updated
Jun 28, 2026
File size
352.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
21.26.4
Languages
AF, SQ, AM, Arabic, HY, AZ +66 more
View full YouTube report →

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

YouTube trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or YouTube? v
YouTube earns about $381.33M per month, while Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.64M. That is a 232.1× revenue gap (~$379.68M more per month for YouTube). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.72M/year, YouTube ≈ $4.58B/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or YouTube? v
YouTube leads with about 5.0B estimated downloads vs 16.5M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - a 303.7× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 110K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 47.9M ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and YouTube offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. YouTube: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; YouTube runs "Subscription (~$20.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #2". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or YouTube? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 110K ratings, YouTube 47.9M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.64M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $381.33M for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.