Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.64M/mo
~$19.72M/yr · 16.5M installs
VS
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor
Cardinal Blue
App Store
$1.53M/mo
~$18.31M/yr · 309.5M installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+8% vs other
Installs winner
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor wins
+1780% vs other
MAU winner
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor wins
+303% vs other
Rating winner
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor wins
+1% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor's $4.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
vs
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.64M
◀
$1.53M
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.72M
◀
$18.31M
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.5M
▶
309.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
▶
15.8M
App Store rating
4.75★
▶
4.79★
Total ratings
110K
▶
1.8M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
=
10 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 8, 2026
- File size
- 138.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.3
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- 216.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 8.63.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +6 more
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.64M per month, while PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor earns about $1.53M. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$117.0K more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.72M/year, PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor ≈ $18.31M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor? v
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor leads with about 309.5M estimated downloads vs 16.5M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - a 18.8× gap. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 110K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 1.8M ratings.
Are Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor offer? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor runs "Subscription (~$3.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor? v
PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 110K ratings, PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor 1.8M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera vs PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.64M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera and $1.53M for PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera or PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.