DICA Seoul vs PhotoPills
DICA Seoul
Anything Studio
App Store
$155/mo
~$1.9K/yr · 2K installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills S.L.
App Store
$35.4K/mo
~$424.8K/yr · 121K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+22740% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+7953% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+7779% vs other
Rating winner
DICA Seoul wins
+6% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 228× more per month than DICA Seoul - $35.4K vs $155.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~121K lifetime installs vs DICA Seoul's ~2K - 80.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
DICA Seoul
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$155
▶
$35.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.9K
▶
$424.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
121K
Monthly active users (est.)?
484.5
▶
38K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.71★
Total ratings
2
▶
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 15, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 15.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- AF, Arabic, BE, BN, Bulgarian, KM +53 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Mar 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 51.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.13.25
- Languages
- Catalan, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +3 more
DICA Seoul trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, DICA Seoul or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $35.4K per month, while DICA Seoul earns about $155. That is a 228.4× revenue gap (~$35.2K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: DICA Seoul ≈ $1.9K/year, PhotoPills ≈ $424.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, DICA Seoul or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 121K estimated downloads vs 2K for DICA Seoul - a 80.5× gap. DICA Seoul's App Store downloads are estimated from 2 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings.
Are DICA Seoul and PhotoPills in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do DICA Seoul and PhotoPills offer? v
DICA Seoul: IAP range 2 tiers detected. PhotoPills: no IAP detected on the public listing. DICA Seoul runs a "Free + one-time IAP (2 tiers)" monetization model; PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, DICA Seoul or PhotoPills? v
DICA Seoul edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: DICA Seoul 2 ratings, PhotoPills 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these DICA Seoul vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $155 for DICA Seoul and $35.4K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare DICA Seoul or PhotoPills to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.