DICA Seoul vs YouTube
DICA Seoul
Anything Studio
App Store
$155/mo
~$1.9K/yr · 2K installs
VS
YouTube
Google
App Store
$368.24M/mo
~$4.42B/yr · 5.0B installs
Revenue winner
YouTube wins
+237572983% vs other
Installs winner
YouTube wins
+333333233% vs other
MAU winner
YouTube wins
+557275442% vs other
Rating winner
DICA Seoul wins
+7% vs other
Why YouTube is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- YouTube earns roughly 2375731× more per month than DICA Seoul - $368.24M vs $155.
- Subscription model. YouTube runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; DICA Seoul relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. YouTube has ~5.0B lifetime installs vs DICA Seoul's ~2K - 3333333.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. YouTube runs 5 IAP tiers vs 2 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full YouTube report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
DICA Seoul
vs
YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$155
▶
$368.24M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.9K
▶
$4.42B
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
5.0B
Monthly active users (est.)?
484.5
▶
2.7B
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.67★
Total ratings
2
▶
47.8M
US grossing rank
-
▶
#2
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 15, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 15.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- AF, Arabic, BE, BN, Bulgarian, KM +53 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 11, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 21, 2026
- File size
- 352.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 21.25.5
- Languages
- AF, SQ, AM, Arabic, HY, AZ +66 more
DICA Seoul trajectory
YouTube trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, DICA Seoul or YouTube? v
YouTube earns about $368.24M per month, while DICA Seoul earns about $155. That is a 2375730.8× revenue gap (~$368.24M more per month for YouTube). Annual revenue: DICA Seoul ≈ $1.9K/year, YouTube ≈ $4.42B/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, DICA Seoul or YouTube? v
YouTube leads with about 5.0B estimated downloads vs 2K for DICA Seoul - a 3333333.3× gap. DICA Seoul's App Store downloads are estimated from 2 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 47.8M ratings.
Are DICA Seoul and YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do DICA Seoul and YouTube offer? v
DICA Seoul: IAP range 2 tiers detected. YouTube: IAP range 5 tiers detected. DICA Seoul runs a "Free + one-time IAP (2 tiers)" monetization model; YouTube runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #2". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, DICA Seoul or YouTube? v
DICA Seoul edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: DICA Seoul 2 ratings, YouTube 47.8M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these DICA Seoul vs YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $155 for DICA Seoul and $368.24M for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare DICA Seoul or YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.