Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club vs Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes

Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes earns about $2.1K per month, while Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club earns about $29. That is a 73.2× revenue gap (~$2.1K more per month for Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes). Annual revenue: Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club ≈ $344/year, Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes ≈ $25.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes leads with about 55K estimated downloads vs 1K for Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club - a 42.7× gap. Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club: IAP range $2.99 - $28.99 per item. Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes: IAP range $10.99 - $59.99 per item. Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club runs a "Subscription (~$9.31/mo)" monetization model; Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes runs "Subscription (~$25.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $29 for Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club and $2.1K for Food For Fitness: Easy Recipes are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.