Epicurious vs Fit To Serve Group
Epicurious
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
App Store
$156.3K/mo
~$1.88M/yr · 10.9M installs
VS
Fit To Serve Group
Fit To Serve, LLC
App Store
$197/mo
~$2.4K/yr · 6K installs
Revenue winner
Epicurious wins
+79257% vs other
Installs winner
Epicurious wins
+177370% vs other
MAU winner
Epicurious wins
+207727% vs other
Rating winner
Epicurious wins
+3% vs other
Why Epicurious is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Epicurious earns roughly 794× more per month than Fit To Serve Group - $156.3K vs $197.
- Bigger install base. Epicurious has ~10.9M lifetime installs vs Fit To Serve Group's ~6K - 1774.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Epicurious report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Epicurious
vs
Fit To Serve Group
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156.3K
◀
$197
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.88M
◀
$2.4K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.9M
◀
6K
Monthly active users (est.)?
971K
◀
467.4
App Store rating
4.73★
◀
4.58★
Total ratings
99K
◀
123
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
=
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
3 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 24, 2009
- Last updated
- Feb 16, 2026
- File size
- 136.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 7.3.22
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 20, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2024
- File size
- 56.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.1.2
- Languages
- English
Epicurious trajectory
Fit To Serve Group trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Epicurious or Fit To Serve Group? v
Epicurious earns about $156.3K per month, while Fit To Serve Group earns about $197. That is a 793.6× revenue gap (~$156.1K more per month for Epicurious). Annual revenue: Epicurious ≈ $1.88M/year, Fit To Serve Group ≈ $2.4K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Epicurious or Fit To Serve Group? v
Epicurious leads with about 10.9M estimated downloads vs 6K for Fit To Serve Group - a 1774.7× gap. Epicurious's App Store downloads are estimated from 99K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fit To Serve Group's App Store downloads are estimated from 123 ratings.
Are Epicurious and Fit To Serve Group in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Epicurious and Fit To Serve Group offer? v
Epicurious: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fit To Serve Group: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Epicurious runs a "Subscription (~$4.99/mo)" monetization model; Fit To Serve Group runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Epicurious or Fit To Serve Group? v
Epicurious edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Epicurious 99K ratings, Fit To Serve Group 123 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Epicurious vs Fit To Serve Group revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156.3K for Epicurious and $197 for Fit To Serve Group are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Epicurious or Fit To Serve Group to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.