Epicurious vs Plan to Eat
Epicurious
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
App Store
$156.3K/mo
~$1.88M/yr · 10.9M installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
Revenue winner
Epicurious wins
+1761% vs other
Installs winner
Epicurious wins
+2196% vs other
MAU winner
Epicurious wins
+1617% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+2% vs other
Why Epicurious is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Epicurious earns roughly 19× more per month than Plan to Eat - $156.3K vs $8.4K.
- Premium pricing. Epicurious charges $4.99/mo vs Plan to Eat's $4.58/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Epicurious has ~10.9M lifetime installs vs Plan to Eat's ~475K - 23.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Epicurious report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Epicurious
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156.3K
◀
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.88M
◀
$100.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.9M
◀
475K
Monthly active users (est.)?
971K
◀
57K
App Store rating
4.73★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
99K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
=
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 24, 2009
- Last updated
- Feb 16, 2026
- File size
- 136.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 7.3.22
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Epicurious trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Epicurious or Plan to Eat? v
Epicurious earns about $156.3K per month, while Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K. That is a 18.6× revenue gap (~$147.9K more per month for Epicurious). Annual revenue: Epicurious ≈ $1.88M/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Epicurious or Plan to Eat? v
Epicurious leads with about 10.9M estimated downloads vs 475K for Plan to Eat - a 23.0× gap. Epicurious's App Store downloads are estimated from 99K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Epicurious and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Epicurious and Plan to Eat offer? v
Epicurious: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Epicurious runs a "Subscription (~$4.99/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Epicurious or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Epicurious 99K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Epicurious vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156.3K for Epicurious and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Epicurious or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.