Epicurious vs World of Mouth
Epicurious
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
App Store
$156.3K/mo
~$1.88M/yr · 10.9M installs
VS
World of Mouth
World of Mouth Oy
App Store
$791/mo
~$9.5K/yr · 17K installs
Revenue winner
Epicurious wins
+19662% vs other
Installs winner
Epicurious wins
+63348% vs other
MAU winner
Epicurious wins
+46957% vs other
Rating winner
World of Mouth wins
+3% vs other
Why Epicurious is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Epicurious earns roughly 198× more per month than World of Mouth - $156.3K vs $791.
- Aggressive pricing. Epicurious undercuts at $4.99/mo vs $11.90/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Epicurious has ~10.9M lifetime installs vs World of Mouth's ~17K - 634.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Epicurious report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Epicurious
vs
World of Mouth
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156.3K
◀
$791
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.88M
◀
$9.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.9M
◀
17K
Monthly active users (est.)?
971K
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.73★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
99K
◀
344
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$11.90
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
4 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 24, 2009
- Last updated
- Feb 16, 2026
- File size
- 136.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 7.3.22
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 20, 2019
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- 109.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 7.2.0
- Languages
- English
Epicurious trajectory
World of Mouth trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Epicurious or World of Mouth? v
Epicurious earns about $156.3K per month, while World of Mouth earns about $791. That is a 197.6× revenue gap (~$155.5K more per month for Epicurious). Annual revenue: Epicurious ≈ $1.88M/year, World of Mouth ≈ $9.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Epicurious or World of Mouth? v
Epicurious leads with about 10.9M estimated downloads vs 17K for World of Mouth - a 634.5× gap. Epicurious's App Store downloads are estimated from 99K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. World of Mouth's App Store downloads are estimated from 344 ratings.
Are Epicurious and World of Mouth in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Epicurious and World of Mouth offer? v
Epicurious: IAP range 1 tiers detected. World of Mouth: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Epicurious runs a "Subscription (~$4.99/mo)" monetization model; World of Mouth runs "Subscription (~$11.90/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Epicurious or World of Mouth? v
World of Mouth edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Epicurious 99K ratings, World of Mouth 344 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Epicurious vs World of Mouth revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156.3K for Epicurious and $791 for World of Mouth are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Epicurious or World of Mouth to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.