f/ Tools vs Resizable - Photo size
f/ Tools
David Quiles
App Store
$53/mo
~$639/yr · 400 installs
VS
Resizable - Photo size
Alexander Sukhanov
App Store
$79/mo
~$950/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
Resizable - Photo size wins
+49% vs other
Installs winner
Resizable - Photo size wins
+650% vs other
MAU winner
Resizable - Photo size wins
+399% vs other
Rating winner
Resizable - Photo size wins
+9% vs other
Why Resizable - Photo size is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. Resizable - Photo size has ~3K lifetime installs vs f/ Tools's ~400 - 7.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Resizable - Photo size sits at 4.00★ vs 3.67★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Resizable - Photo size report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$53
▶
$79
Annual revenue (est.)
$639
▶
$950
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
117.2
▶
585
App Store rating
3.67★
▶
4.00★
Total ratings
6
▶
60
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Jul 8, 2013
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 9.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Sep 9, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 4, 2019
- File size
- 14.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.1
- Languages
- English
f/ Tools trajectory
Resizable - Photo size trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, f/ Tools or Resizable - Photo size? v
Resizable - Photo size earns about $79 per month, while f/ Tools earns about $53. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$26 more per month for Resizable - Photo size). Annual revenue: f/ Tools ≈ $639/year, Resizable - Photo size ≈ $950/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, f/ Tools or Resizable - Photo size? v
Resizable - Photo size leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 400 for f/ Tools - a 7.5× gap. f/ Tools's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Resizable - Photo size's App Store downloads are estimated from 60 ratings.
Are f/ Tools and Resizable - Photo size in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do f/ Tools and Resizable - Photo size have in-app purchases? v
f/ Tools does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Resizable - Photo size does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: f/ Tools runs "Paid app ($4.99)", Resizable - Photo size runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, f/ Tools or Resizable - Photo size? v
Resizable - Photo size edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: f/ Tools 6 ratings, Resizable - Photo size 60 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these f/ Tools vs Resizable - Photo size revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $53 for f/ Tools and $79 for Resizable - Photo size are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare f/ Tools or Resizable - Photo size to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
