FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo

FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor

FaceApp Technology Ltd
Google Play
$10.91M/mo
~$130.93M/yr · 580.5M installs
VS

TON: Filters for Video & Photo

Mobile Presets & Filters
Google Play
$189.4K/mo
~$2.27M/yr · 3.1M installs
Revenue winner FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor wins +5660% vs other
Installs winner FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor wins +18598% vs other
MAU winner FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor wins +5087% vs other
Rating winner TON: Filters for Video & Photo wins +2% vs other

Why FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor earns roughly 58× more per month than TON: Filters for Video & Photo - $10.91M vs $189.4K.
  2. Premium pricing. FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor charges $22.34/mo vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo's $14.48/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor has ~580.5M lifetime installs vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo's ~3.1M - 187.0× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor
vs
TON: Filters for Video & Photo
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$10.91M
$189.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$130.93M
$2.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
580.5M
3.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.0M
481K
App Store rating
4.32★
4.42★
Total ratings
5.3M
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$22.34
$14.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor

FaceApp Technology Ltd
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
Feb 14, 2017
Last updated
Apr 29, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor report →

TON: Filters for Video & Photo

Mobile Presets & Filters
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
Jun 7, 2022
Last updated
Oct 28, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.5.1
Languages
-
View full TON: Filters for Video & Photo report →

FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

TON: Filters for Video & Photo trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor earns about $10.91M per month, while TON: Filters for Video & Photo earns about $189.4K. That is a 57.6× revenue gap (~$10.72M more per month for FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor). Annual revenue: FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor ≈ $130.93M/year, TON: Filters for Video & Photo ≈ $2.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor leads with about 580.5M estimated downloads vs 3.1M for TON: Filters for Video & Photo - a 187.0× gap. FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor reports 500,000,000+ installs on Google Play. TON: Filters for Video & Photo reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor and TON: Filters for Video & Photo in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor and TON: Filters for Video & Photo offer? v
FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor: IAP range $4.99 - $99.99 per item. TON: Filters for Video & Photo: IAP range $6.99 - $29.99 per item. FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor runs a "Subscription (~$22.34/mo)" monetization model; TON: Filters for Video & Photo runs "Subscription (~$14.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
TON: Filters for Video & Photo edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor 77K ratings, TON: Filters for Video & Photo 71 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $10.91M for FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor and $189.4K for TON: Filters for Video & Photo are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FaceApp: Perfect Face Editor or TON: Filters for Video & Photo to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.