Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.6K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 790K installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$95.2K/mo
~$1.14M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+11% vs other
Installs winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+65% vs other
MAU winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+12% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why MacroFactor - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker undercuts at $11.99/mo vs $19.57/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker has ~1.3M lifetime installs vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's ~790K - 1.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$85.6K
▶
$95.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.03M
▶
$1.14M
Lifetime installs (est.)
790K
▶
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
150K
▶
168K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
7K
▶
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.57
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Mar 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.6
- Languages
- -
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $95.2K per month, while Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.6K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$9.6K more per month for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.14M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 790K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - a 1.6× gap. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs a "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $85.6K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and $95.2K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.