Fill Storage vs TotalAV
Fill Storage
FINE CO., LTD.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
TotalAV
Total Security Limited
App Store
$237.4K/mo
~$2.85M/yr · 7.8M installs
Revenue winner
TotalAV wins
+23742200% vs other
Installs winner
TotalAV wins
+784729000% vs other
MAU winner
TotalAV wins
+91813293% vs other
Rating winner
TotalAV wins
+458% vs other
Why TotalAV is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TotalAV earns roughly 237422× more per month than Fill Storage - $237.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. TotalAV runs a $7.99/mo subscription that compounds; Fill Storage relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. TotalAV has ~7.8M lifetime installs vs Fill Storage's ~0 - 7847290.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. TotalAV runs 9 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TotalAV report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$237.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$2.85M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
7.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
918K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.58★
Total ratings
0
▶
71K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$7.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
9 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Feb 13, 2024
- Last updated
- Feb 13, 2024
- File size
- 0.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Feb 17, 2026
- File size
- 60.4 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.4.2
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German +7 more
Fill Storage trajectory
TotalAV trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fill Storage or TotalAV? v
TotalAV earns about $237.4K per month, while Fill Storage earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$237.4K more per month for TotalAV). Annual revenue: Fill Storage ≈ $0/year, TotalAV ≈ $2.85M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fill Storage or TotalAV? v
TotalAV leads with about 7.8M estimated downloads vs 0 for Fill Storage - a ∞× gap. Fill Storage's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TotalAV's App Store downloads are estimated from 71K ratings.
Are Fill Storage and TotalAV in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fill Storage and TotalAV offer? v
Fill Storage: no IAP detected on the public listing. TotalAV: IAP range 9 tiers detected. Fill Storage runs a "Paid app ($0.99)" monetization model; TotalAV runs "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fill Storage or TotalAV? v
TotalAV edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: Fill Storage 0 ratings, TotalAV 71K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fill Storage vs TotalAV revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Fill Storage and $237.4K for TotalAV are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fill Storage or TotalAV to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
