Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs GI and glycemic load
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
GI and glycemic load
Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$546/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+5881843% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+3873598% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+2365091% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+453% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 58819× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $2.71M vs $46.
- Subscription model. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 38737.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
GI and glycemic load
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$46
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
◀
$546
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
529.776
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
-
Total ratings
658K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Sep 18, 2016
- Last updated
- Sep 30, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.10
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
GI and glycemic load trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or GI and glycemic load? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 58819.4× revenue gap (~$2.71M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, GI and glycemic load ≈ $546/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or GI and glycemic load? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 38737.0× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and GI and glycemic load in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and GI and glycemic load offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; GI and glycemic load runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or GI and glycemic load? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, GI and glycemic load 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs GI and glycemic load revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $46 for GI and glycemic load are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or GI and glycemic load to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.