Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.51M/yr · 98.8M installs
VS

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
Google Play
$16.6K/mo
~$199.3K/yr · 159K installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +16211% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +62097% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +42830% vs other
Rating winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +453% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 163× more per month than Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - $2.71M vs $16.6K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $22.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.8M lifetime installs vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente's ~159K - 622.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
$16.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.51M
$199.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.8M
159K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
29K
App Store rating
4.53★
-
Total ratings
659K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$22.49
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
0 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 24, 2020
Last updated
Apr 30, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.2.1
Languages
-
View full Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente earns about $16.6K. That is a 163.1× revenue gap (~$2.69M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.51M/year, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente ≈ $199.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.8M estimated downloads vs 159K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - a 622.0× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 659K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente: IAP range $3.49 - $144.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente runs "Subscription (~$22.49/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 659K ratings, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $16.6K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.