Google Health (Fitbit) vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.74M/mo
~$68.94M/yr · 268.8M installs
VS
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Cotto al Dente
Google Play
$16.7K/mo
~$200.6K/yr · 160K installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+34267% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+168034% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+30968% vs other
Rating winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+376% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 344× more per month than Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - $5.74M vs $16.7K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente's $22.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~268.8M lifetime installs vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente's ~160K - 1681.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Google Health (Fitbit) sits at 3.76★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.74M
◀
$16.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.94M
◀
$200.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
268.8M
◀
160K
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.1M
◀
29K
App Store rating
3.76★
◀
-
Total ratings
1.3M
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
◀
$22.49
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 24, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.2.1
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.74M per month, while Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente earns about $16.7K. That is a 343.7× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.94M/year, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente ≈ $200.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 268.8M estimated downloads vs 160K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - a 1681.3× gap. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente: IAP range $3.49 - $144.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)" monetization model; Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente runs "Subscription (~$22.49/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Google Health (Fitbit) edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.8 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 251K ratings, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.74M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $16.7K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.