Google Health (Fitbit) vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google
App Store
$1.36M/mo
~$16.32M/yr · 101.5M installs
VS

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
$4.75M/mo
~$57.05M/yr · 56.5M installs
Revenue winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +249% vs other
Installs winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +80% vs other
MAU winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +50% vs other
Rating winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +2% vs other

Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 3× more per month than Google Health (Fitbit) - $4.75M vs $1.36M.
  2. Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs Google Health (Fitbit)'s $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.36M
$4.75M
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.32M
$57.05M
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.5M
56.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
4.8M
App Store rating
4.49★
4.41★
Total ratings
677K
828K
US grossing rank
#94
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
0 tiers

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
Jun 23, 2026
File size
548.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
5.02.1
Languages
Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
View full Google Health (Fitbit) report →

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 23, 2014
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
26.26.2
Languages
-
View full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report →

Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.75M per month, while Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.36M. That is a 3.5× revenue gap (~$3.39M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $16.32M/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $57.05M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 56.5M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker - a 1.8× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #94" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.36M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $4.75M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.