Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.51M/yr · 98.8M installs
VS

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
$4.68M/mo
~$56.18M/yr · 55.7M installs
Revenue winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +73% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +77% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +165% vs other
Rating winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +3% vs other

Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 2× more per month than Fitbit: Health & Fitness - $4.68M vs $2.71M.
  2. Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
$4.68M
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.51M
$56.18M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.8M
55.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
4.7M
App Store rating
4.53★
4.40★
Total ratings
659K
805K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
0 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 23, 2014
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
12.83.1
Languages
-
View full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.68M per month, while Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M. That is a 1.7× revenue gap (~$1.97M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.51M/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.18M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.8M estimated downloads vs 55.7M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker - a 1.8× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 659K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 659K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $4.68M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.