Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$674.8K/mo
~$8.10M/yr · 13.5M installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 350.0M installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+67476700% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+2487% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+870% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+38% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns roughly 674767× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $674.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans runs a $9.44/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans sits at 4.83★ vs 3.51★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$674.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$8.10M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
13.5M
▶
350.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
▶
11.5M
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
3.51★
Total ratings
350K
▶
679K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.44
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.0.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns about $674.8K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$674.8K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans). Annual revenue: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans ≈ $8.10M/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 350.0M estimated downloads vs 13.5M for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans - a 25.9× gap. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans runs a "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans 762 ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 29K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $674.8K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.