Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.0K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 350.0M installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+49597900% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+3320% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+1366% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+31% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 495979× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $496.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a $27.91/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.61★ vs 3.51★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$496.0K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.95M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.2M
▶
350.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
788K
▶
11.5M
App Store rating
4.61★
◀
3.51★
Total ratings
151K
▶
679K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.91
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.0K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$496.0K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 350.0M estimated downloads vs 10.2M for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter - a 34.2× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 29K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $496.0K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.