Google Health (Fitbit) vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.74M/mo
~$68.88M/yr · 268.1M installs
VS
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$533.3K/mo
~$6.40M/yr · 11.0M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+976% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2340% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+978% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+23% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 11× more per month than Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter - $5.74M vs $533.3K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's $27.91/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~268.1M lifetime installs vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's ~11.0M - 24.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.74M
◀
$533.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.88M
◀
$6.40M
Lifetime installs (est.)
268.1M
◀
11.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.1M
◀
846K
App Store rating
3.78★
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
1.3M
◀
174K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$28.27
◀
$27.91
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.74M per month, while Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $533.3K. That is a 10.8× revenue gap (~$5.21M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.88M/year, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.40M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 268.1M estimated downloads vs 11.0M for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter - a 24.4× gap. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)" monetization model; Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.74M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $533.3K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.