Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs EatWild®
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
VS
EatWild®
EatWild App
Google Play
$22/mo
~$266/yr · 406 installs
Revenue winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+159% vs other
Installs winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+627% vs other
MAU winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+679% vs other
Rating winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+490% vs other
Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 3× more per month than EatWild® - $57 vs $22.
- Aggressive pricing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food undercuts at $3.00/mo vs $36.04/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fork Ranger - sustainable food has ~3K lifetime installs vs EatWild®'s ~406 - 7.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
EatWild®
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$57
◀
$22
Annual revenue (est.)
$685
◀
$266
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
◀
406
Monthly active users (est.)?
354
◀
45.472
App Store rating
4.90★
◀
-
Total ratings
59
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
▶
$36.04
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 34.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.3
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 19, 2025
- Last updated
- Jul 17, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2.0
- Languages
- -
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
EatWild® trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or EatWild®? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57 per month, while EatWild® earns about $22. That is a 2.6× revenue gap (~$35 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year, EatWild® ≈ $266/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or EatWild®? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 406 for EatWild® - a 7.3× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 58 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. EatWild® reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and EatWild® in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and EatWild® offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. EatWild®: IAP range $9.99 - $129.99 per item. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; EatWild® runs "Subscription (~$36.04/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or EatWild®? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 58 ratings, EatWild® 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs EatWild® revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $22 for EatWild® are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or EatWild® to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.