Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs KiPass

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
VS

KiPass

EATPASS S.A. DE C.V.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
Revenue winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +6400% vs other
Installs winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +330000% vs other
MAU winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +39600% vs other
Rating winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +488% vs other

Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 64× more per month than KiPass - $64 vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a $3.00/mo subscription that compounds; KiPass relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Fork Ranger - sustainable food has ~3K lifetime installs vs KiPass's ~0 - 3300.0× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
KiPass
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$766
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
◀
0
Monthly active users (est.)?
396
◀
0
App Store rating
4.88★
◀
-
Total ratings
66
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2021
Last updated
Jun 25, 2026
File size
34.7 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.6
Languages
Dutch, English, German
View full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report →

KiPass

EATPASS S.A. DE C.V.
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jun 30, 2025
Last updated
Apr 23, 2026
File size
57.7 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.1.27
Languages
English
View full KiPass report →

Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

KiPass trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Fork Ranger - sustainable food App Store page →KiPass App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Love Manuela iOSFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KiPass? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64 per month, while KiPass earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$64 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year, KiPass ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KiPass? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 0 for KiPass - a ∞× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 65 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. KiPass's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and KiPass in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and KiPass offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. KiPass: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; KiPass runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KiPass? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 65 ratings, KiPass 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs KiPass revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $0 for KiPass are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KiPass to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.