Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
VS

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Daesung Park
App Store
$2/mo
~$23/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +3100% vs other
Installs winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +725% vs other
MAU winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +732% vs other
Rating winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +0% vs other

Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 32× more per month than KitchenCost - Recipe Costing - $64 vs $2.
  2. Premium pricing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food charges $3.00/mo vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fork Ranger - sustainable food has ~3K lifetime installs vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's ~400 - 8.3× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs 4 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
KitchenCost - Recipe Costing
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$766
$23
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
396
47.6
App Store rating
4.88★
4.86★
Total ratings
66
7
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
3 tiers

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2021
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
34.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.7
Languages
Dutch, English, German
View full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report →

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Daesung Park
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 25, 2025
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
48.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.7.170
Languages
English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese +6 more
View full KitchenCost - Recipe Costing report →

Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64 per month, while KitchenCost - Recipe Costing earns about $2. That is a 32.0× revenue gap (~$62 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year, KitchenCost - Recipe Costing ≈ $23/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 400 for KitchenCost - Recipe Costing - a 8.3× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 66 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's App Store downloads are estimated from 7 ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and KitchenCost - Recipe Costing in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and KitchenCost - Recipe Costing offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. KitchenCost - Recipe Costing: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; KitchenCost - Recipe Costing runs "Subscription (~$1.25/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 66 ratings, KitchenCost - Recipe Costing 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $2 for KitchenCost - Recipe Costing are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.