Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
VS

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
$938.1K/mo
~$11.26M/yr · 80.8M installs
Revenue winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +1465750% vs other
Installs winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +2448536% vs other
MAU winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +1224218% vs other
Rating winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +1% vs other

Why NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns roughly 14659× more per month than Fork Ranger - sustainable food - $938.1K vs $64.
  2. Premium pricing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals charges $4.99/mo vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's $3.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals has ~80.8M lifetime installs vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's ~3K - 24486.4× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs 9 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$938.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$766
▶
$11.26M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
80.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
396
▶
4.8M
App Store rating
4.88★
▶
4.91★
Total ratings
66
▶
539K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
▶
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
9 tiers

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2021
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
34.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.7
Languages
Dutch, English, German
View full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report →

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Sep 17, 2014
Last updated
Jun 25, 2026
File size
108.5 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
4.162.0
Languages
English
View full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report →

Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Fork Ranger - sustainable food App Store page →NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Love Manuela iOSFork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Fork Ranger Sustainable Food iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $938.1K per month, while Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64. That is a 14658.5× revenue gap (~$938.1K more per month for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $11.26M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.8M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 24486.4× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 66 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 539K ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals: IAP range 9 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 66 ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 539K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $938.1K for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.