Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
VS

Starting solids - Baby Foods +

Sergey Lomakin
App Store
$2/mo
~$23/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +3100% vs other
Installs winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +725% vs other
MAU winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +739% vs other
Rating winner Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins +5% vs other

Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 32× more per month than Starting solids - Baby Foods + - $64 vs $2.
  2. Premium pricing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food charges $3.00/mo vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s $1.24/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fork Ranger - sustainable food has ~3K lifetime installs vs Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s ~400 - 8.3× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
Starting solids - Baby Foods +
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$766
$23
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
396
47.2
App Store rating
4.88★
4.67★
Total ratings
66
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
$1.24
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
=
4 tiers

Fork Ranger - sustainable food

Fork Ranger
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2021
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
34.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
9.7
Languages
Dutch, English, German
View full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report →

Starting solids - Baby Foods +

Sergey Lomakin
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2025
Last updated
Jun 4, 2026
File size
92.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.2.8
Languages
Arabic, English, French, German, Hindi, Italian +7 more
View full Starting solids - Baby Foods + report →

Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Starting solids - Baby Foods + trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64 per month, while Starting solids - Baby Foods + earns about $2. That is a 32.0× revenue gap (~$62 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year, Starting solids - Baby Foods + ≈ $23/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 400 for Starting solids - Baby Foods + - a 8.3× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 66 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Starting solids - Baby Foods +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and Starting solids - Baby Foods + in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and Starting solids - Baby Foods + offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Starting solids - Baby Foods +: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; Starting solids - Baby Foods + runs "Subscription (~$1.24/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Starting solids - Baby Foods +? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 66 ratings, Starting solids - Baby Foods + 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs Starting solids - Baby Foods + revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $2 for Starting solids - Baby Foods + are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Starting solids - Baby Foods + to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.