Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
VS
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Treat App
App Store
$967.6K/mo
~$11.61M/yr · 5.2M installs
Revenue winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+1697461% vs other
Installs winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+177406% vs other
MAU winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+177406% vs other
Rating winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+0% vs other
Why TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns roughly 16976× more per month than Fork Ranger - sustainable food - $967.6K vs $57.
- Premium pricing. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs charges $47.75/mo vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's $3.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs has ~5.2M lifetime installs vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's ~3K - 1775.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs 10 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$57
▶
$967.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$685
▶
$11.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
5.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
354
▶
628K
App Store rating
4.90★
◀
4.89★
Total ratings
59
▶
48K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
▶
$47.75
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 34.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.3.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 12, 2026
- File size
- 267.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 20.6.1
- Languages
- English, Russian
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns about $967.6K per month, while Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57. That is a 16975.6× revenue gap (~$967.6K more per month for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs ≈ $11.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs leads with about 5.2M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 1775.1× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 59 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs's App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs "Subscription (~$47.75/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 59 ratings, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs 48K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $967.6K for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.