Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
VS
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
M. Shanken Communications, Inc.
App Store
$773/mo
~$9.3K/yr · 81K installs
Revenue winner
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator wins
+1108% vs other
Installs winner
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator wins
+2363% vs other
MAU winner
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator wins
+2322% vs other
Rating winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+5% vs other
Why WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator earns roughly 12× more per month than Fork Ranger - sustainable food - $773 vs $64.
- Aggressive pricing. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator undercuts at $2.99/mo vs $3.00/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator has ~81K lifetime installs vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's ~3K - 24.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$773
Annual revenue (est.)
$766
▶
$9.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
81K
Monthly active users (est.)?
396
▶
10K
App Store rating
4.88★
◀
4.65★
Total ratings
66
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
◀
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 34.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.7
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 23, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 283.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 6.9.4
- Languages
- English
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator earns about $773 per month, while Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64. That is a 12.1× revenue gap (~$709 more per month for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator ≈ $9.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator leads with about 81K estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 24.6× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 66 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator runs "Subscription (~$2.50/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 66 ratings, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $773 for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.