FSW296 Analog Watch face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face

FSW296 Analog Watch face

FS Watch face
Google Play
$12/mo
~$141/yr · 655 installs
VS

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face

NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$134/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins +1017% vs other
Installs winner NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins +968% vs other
MAU winner NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins +854% vs other
Rating winner NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins +258% vs other

Why NXV43 Elegant Watch Face is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns roughly 11× more per month than FSW296 Analog Watch face - $134 vs $12.
  2. Bigger install base. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face has ~7K lifetime installs vs FSW296 Analog Watch face's ~655 - 10.7× the funnel top.
  3. Better app store reviews. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face sits at 2.58★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

FSW296 Analog Watch face
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$12
$134
Annual revenue (est.)
$141
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
655
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
73.36
699.7
App Store rating
-
2.58★
Total ratings
0
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

FSW296 Analog Watch face

FS Watch face
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.49
Released
Oct 22, 2025
Last updated
Oct 22, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full FSW296 Analog Watch face report →

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face

NXV Watch Face
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD1.59
Released
Dec 18, 2021
Last updated
Sep 20, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report →

FSW296 Analog Watch face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, FSW296 Analog Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $134 per month, while FSW296 Analog Watch face earns about $12. That is a 11.2× revenue gap (~$122 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: FSW296 Analog Watch face ≈ $141/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FSW296 Analog Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face leads with about 7K estimated downloads vs 655 for FSW296 Analog Watch face - a 10.7× gap. FSW296 Analog Watch face reports 500+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FSW296 Analog Watch face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do FSW296 Analog Watch face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
FSW296 Analog Watch face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: FSW296 Analog Watch face runs "Paid app ($1.49)", NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)".
Which has better ratings, FSW296 Analog Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 2.6 stars). Rating volume: FSW296 Analog Watch face 0 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FSW296 Analog Watch face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $12 for FSW296 Analog Watch face and $134 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FSW296 Analog Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.