FSW296 Analog Watch face vs Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face
FSW296 Analog Watch face
FS Watch face
Google Play
$13/mo
~$150/yr · 701 installs
VS
Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face
Sparkine Labs
Google Play
$9/mo
~$109/yr · 506 installs
Revenue winner
FSW296 Analog Watch face wins
+44% vs other
Installs winner
FSW296 Analog Watch face wins
+39% vs other
MAU winner
FSW296 Analog Watch face wins
+33% vs other
Rating winner
Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face wins
+460% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FSW296 Analog Watch face
vs
Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$13
◀
$9
Annual revenue (est.)
$150
◀
$109
Lifetime installs (est.)
701
◀
506
Monthly active users (est.)?
78.512
◀
59.202
App Store rating
-
▶
4.60★
Total ratings
0
▶
10
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Oct 22, 2025
- Last updated
- Oct 22, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Jan 17, 2026
- Last updated
- Jan 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.0.0
- Languages
- -
FSW296 Analog Watch face trajectory
Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FSW296 Analog Watch face or Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face? v
FSW296 Analog Watch face earns about $13 per month, while Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face earns about $9. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$4 more per month for FSW296 Analog Watch face). Annual revenue: FSW296 Analog Watch face ≈ $150/year, Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face ≈ $109/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FSW296 Analog Watch face or Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face? v
FSW296 Analog Watch face leads with about 701 estimated downloads vs 506 for Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face - a 1.4× gap. FSW296 Analog Watch face reports 500+ installs on Google Play. Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face reports 500+ installs on Google Play.
Are FSW296 Analog Watch face and Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do FSW296 Analog Watch face and Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
FSW296 Analog Watch face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: FSW296 Analog Watch face runs "Paid app ($1.49)", Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.49)".
Which has better ratings, FSW296 Analog Watch face or Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face? v
Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: FSW296 Analog Watch face 0 ratings, Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FSW296 Analog Watch face vs Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $13 for FSW296 Analog Watch face and $9 for Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FSW296 Analog Watch face or Pixel 4's Rush Hour Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.