Glass Icon Pack vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Glass Icon Pack
AppsLab Co.
Google Play
$91/mo
~$1.1K/yr · 13K installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$138/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+52% vs other
Installs winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+77% vs other
MAU winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+91% vs other
Rating winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+34% vs other
Why NXV43 Elegant Watch Face is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns roughly 2× more per month than Glass Icon Pack - $138 vs $91.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NXV43 Elegant Watch Face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Glass Icon Pack
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$91
▶
$138
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.1K
▶
$1.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
13K
◀
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
◀
732.755
App Store rating
3.57★
◀
2.67★
Total ratings
168
◀
57
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.35
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.59
- Released
- Nov 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Glass Icon Pack trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Glass Icon Pack or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $138 per month, while Glass Icon Pack earns about $91. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$47 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: Glass Icon Pack ≈ $1.1K/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Glass Icon Pack or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Glass Icon Pack leads with about 13K estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 1.8× gap. Glass Icon Pack reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Glass Icon Pack and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Glass Icon Pack and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face offer? v
Glass Icon Pack: IAP range $1.99 - $9.49 per item. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Glass Icon Pack runs a "Paid app ($0.59)" monetization model; NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Glass Icon Pack or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Glass Icon Pack edges ahead with ★ 3.6 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Glass Icon Pack 9 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 22 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Glass Icon Pack vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $91 for Glass Icon Pack and $138 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Glass Icon Pack or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.