Google Fit: Activity Tracking vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 355.5M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$101.4K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+10138400% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+25933% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+6508% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+41% vs other
Why MacroFactor - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns roughly 101384× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $101.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker sits at 4.87★ vs 3.46★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$101.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.22M
Lifetime installs (est.)
355.5M
◀
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
11.7M
◀
178K
App Store rating
3.46★
▶
4.87★
Total ratings
682K
◀
15K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- May 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $101.4K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$101.4K more per month for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 355.5M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 260.3× gap. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Fit: Activity Tracking and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Fit: Activity Tracking and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Fit: Activity Tracking vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking and $101.4K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Fit: Activity Tracking or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.