Google Fit: Activity Tracking vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 356.3M installs
VS
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Yazio
Google Play
$4.75M/mo
~$57.04M/yr · 56.5M installs
Revenue winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+475343100% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+530% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+145% vs other
Rating winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+28% vs other
Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 4753431× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $4.75M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs a $45.79/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker sits at 4.40★ vs 3.45★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$4.75M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$57.04M
Lifetime installs (est.)
356.3M
◀
56.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
11.8M
◀
4.8M
App Store rating
3.45★
▶
4.40★
Total ratings
682K
▶
829K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.26.2
- Languages
- -
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.75M per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$4.75M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $57.04M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 356.3M estimated downloads vs 56.5M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker - a 6.3× gap. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Fit: Activity Tracking and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Fit: Activity Tracking and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Fit: Activity Tracking vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking and $4.75M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Fit: Activity Tracking or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.