h015 Happy Analog Hybrid vs Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face

h015 Happy Analog Hybrid

Happy Watch Faces
Google Play
$65/mo
~$775/yr · 1K installs
VS

Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face

Key Watch Face
Google Play
$10/mo
~$117/yr · 821 installs
Revenue winner h015 Happy Analog Hybrid wins +550% vs other
Installs winner h015 Happy Analog Hybrid wins +31% vs other
MAU winner h015 Happy Analog Hybrid wins +31% vs other
Rating winnerTied

Why h015 Happy Analog Hybrid is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. h015 Happy Analog Hybrid earns roughly 7× more per month than Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face - $65 vs $10.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full h015 Happy Analog Hybrid report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

h015 Happy Analog Hybrid
vs
Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$65
$10
Annual revenue (est.)
$775
$117
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
821
Monthly active users (est.)?
120.736
91.952
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

h015 Happy Analog Hybrid

Happy Watch Faces
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD4.99
Released
Jan 8, 2025
Last updated
Jan 30, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full h015 Happy Analog Hybrid report →

Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face

Key Watch Face
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD0.99
Released
Aug 9, 2024
Last updated
Oct 14, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face report →

h015 Happy Analog Hybrid trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, h015 Happy Analog Hybrid or Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face? v
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid earns about $65 per month, while Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face earns about $10. That is a 6.5× revenue gap (~$55 more per month for h015 Happy Analog Hybrid). Annual revenue: h015 Happy Analog Hybrid ≈ $775/year, Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face ≈ $117/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, h015 Happy Analog Hybrid or Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face? v
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid leads with about 1K estimated downloads vs 821 for Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face - a 1.3× gap. h015 Happy Analog Hybrid reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face reports 500+ installs on Google Play.
Are h015 Happy Analog Hybrid and Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do h015 Happy Analog Hybrid and Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
h015 Happy Analog Hybrid does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: h015 Happy Analog Hybrid runs "Paid app ($4.99)", Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
How accurate are these h015 Happy Analog Hybrid vs Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $65 for h015 Happy Analog Hybrid and $10 for Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare h015 Happy Analog Hybrid or Key WF39 Hybrid Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.