Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs ahm

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
$312.8K/mo
~$3.75M/yr · 5.3M installs
VS

ahm

Medibank Private Limited
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 340K installs
Revenue winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +31278400% vs other
Installs winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +1462% vs other
MAU winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +2115% vs other
Rating winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +487% vs other

Why Intermittent Fasting Tracker: is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns roughly 312784× more per month than ahm - $312.8K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs a $0.99/mo subscription that compounds; ahm relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: has ~5.3M lifetime installs vs ahm's ~340K - 15.6× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
vs
ahm
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$312.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.75M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.3M
◀
340K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
63K
App Store rating
4.87★
◀
-
Total ratings
48K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 13, 2023
Last updated
Feb 26, 2026
File size
92.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
0.0.96
Languages
Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
View full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report →

ahm

Medibank Private Limited
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Jun 24, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
51.4.1
Languages
-
View full ahm report →

Intermittent Fasting Tracker: trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

ahm trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Related app pages

Intermittent Fasting Tracker: App Store page →ahm Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker iOSIntermittent Fasting Tracker iOS vs Calorie Counter Mynetdiary AndroidIntermittent Fasting Tracker iOS vs Cal AI Food Calorie Tracker AndroidIntermittent Fasting Tracker iOS vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidFitbit Health Fitness iOS vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker iOSIntermittent Fasting Tracker iOS vs Stompers Step Counter Friends iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or ahm? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns about $312.8K per month, while ahm earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$312.8K more per month for Intermittent Fasting Tracker:). Annual revenue: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: ≈ $3.75M/year, ahm ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or ahm? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: leads with about 5.3M estimated downloads vs 340K for ahm - a 15.6× gap. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ahm reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and ahm in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and ahm offer? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:: IAP range 8 tiers detected. ahm: no IAP detected on the public listing. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; ahm runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or ahm? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: 48K ratings, ahm 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs ahm revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $312.8K for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and $0 for ahm are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or ahm to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.