Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
Kai Oelfke
App Store
$314.0K/mo
~$3.77M/yr · 5.3M installs
VS
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
Google Play
$130.4K/mo
~$1.56M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins
+141% vs other
Installs winner
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins
+286% vs other
MAU winner
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins
+595% vs other
Rating winner
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins
+4% vs other
Why Intermittent Fasting Tracker: is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns roughly 2× more per month than Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - $314.0K vs $130.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: has ~5.3M lifetime installs vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's ~1.4M - 3.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
vs
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$314.0K
◀
$130.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.77M
◀
$1.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.3M
◀
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
200K
App Store rating
4.87★
◀
4.68★
Total ratings
48K
▶
122K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 13, 2023
- Last updated
- Feb 26, 2026
- File size
- 92.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 0.0.96
- Languages
- Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 27, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.30
- Languages
- -
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: trajectory
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns about $314.0K per month, while Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $130.4K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$183.5K more per month for Intermittent Fasting Tracker:). Annual revenue: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: ≈ $3.77M/year, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $1.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: leads with about 5.3M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 3.9× gap. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter offer? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range $9.99 - $39.99 per item. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: 48K ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 673 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $314.0K for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and $130.4K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.