Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs GI and glycemic load

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
$314.1K/mo
~$3.77M/yr · 5.3M installs
VS

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$549/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +682833% vs other
Installs winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +208294% vs other
MAU winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +261394% vs other
Rating winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +487% vs other

Why Intermittent Fasting Tracker: is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns roughly 6829× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $314.1K vs $46.
  2. Subscription model. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs a $0.99/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: has ~5.3M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 2083.9× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
vs
GI and glycemic load
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$314.1K
$46
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.77M
$549
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.3M
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
532.064
App Store rating
4.87★
-
Total ratings
48K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
0 tiers

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 13, 2023
Last updated
Feb 26, 2026
File size
92.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
0.0.96
Languages
Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
View full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report →

GI and glycemic load

Sipione
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
USD1.49
Released
Sep 18, 2016
Last updated
Sep 30, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.0.10
Languages
-
View full GI and glycemic load report →

Intermittent Fasting Tracker: trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

GI and glycemic load trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or GI and glycemic load? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns about $314.1K per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 6829.3× revenue gap (~$314.1K more per month for Intermittent Fasting Tracker:). Annual revenue: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: ≈ $3.77M/year, GI and glycemic load ≈ $549/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or GI and glycemic load? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: leads with about 5.3M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 2083.9× gap. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and GI and glycemic load in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and GI and glycemic load offer? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:: IAP range 8 tiers detected. GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; GI and glycemic load runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or GI and glycemic load? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Intermittent Fasting Tracker: 48K ratings, GI and glycemic load 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Intermittent Fasting Tracker: vs GI and glycemic load revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $314.1K for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: and $46 for GI and glycemic load are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Intermittent Fasting Tracker: or GI and glycemic load to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.