KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO vs UNO!™
KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO
SNK CORPORATION
App Store
$920/mo
~$11.0K/yr · 9K installs
VS
UNO!™
Mattel163 Limited
App Store
$382.4K/mo
~$4.59M/yr · 95.8M installs
Revenue winner
UNO!™ wins
+41460% vs other
Installs winner
UNO!™ wins
+1107578% vs other
MAU winner
UNO!™ wins
+922965% vs other
Rating winner
UNO!™ wins
+30% vs other
Why UNO!™ is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- UNO!™ earns roughly 416× more per month than KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO - $382.4K vs $920.
- Bigger install base. UNO!™ has ~95.8M lifetime installs vs KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO's ~9K - 11076.8× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. UNO!™ runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. UNO!™ sits at 4.69★ vs 3.61★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$920
▶
$382.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$11.0K
▶
$4.59M
Lifetime installs (est.)
9K
▶
95.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
9.6M
App Store rating
3.61★
▶
4.69★
Total ratings
173
▶
639K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- Jan 25, 2022
- Last updated
- Mar 13, 2023
- File size
- 200.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.1.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Spanish
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 15, 2018
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 595.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.99
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +6 more
KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO trajectory
UNO!™ trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO or UNO!™? v
UNO!™ earns about $382.4K per month, while KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO earns about $920. That is a 415.6× revenue gap (~$381.4K more per month for UNO!™). Annual revenue: KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO ≈ $11.0K/year, UNO!™ ≈ $4.59M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO or UNO!™? v
UNO!™ leads with about 95.8M estimated downloads vs 9K for KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO - a 11076.8× gap. KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO's App Store downloads are estimated from 173 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. UNO!™'s App Store downloads are estimated from 639K ratings.
Are KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO and UNO!™ in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO and UNO!™ offer? v
KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO: no IAP detected on the public listing. UNO!™: IAP range 10 tiers detected. KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO runs a "Paid app ($3.99)" monetization model; UNO!™ runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO or UNO!™? v
UNO!™ edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO 173 ratings, UNO!™ 639K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO vs UNO!™ revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $920 for KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO and $382.4K for UNO!™ are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare KOF 2002 ACA NEOGEO or UNO!™ to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
