Letterboxd vs QQ邮箱
Letterboxd
Letterboxd
App Store
$223.3K/mo
~$2.68M/yr · 9.7M installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.9K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
Letterboxd wins
+7573% vs other
Installs winner
Letterboxd wins
+26532% vs other
MAU winner
Letterboxd wins
+43479% vs other
Rating winner
Letterboxd wins
+36% vs other
Why Letterboxd is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Letterboxd earns roughly 77× more per month than QQ邮箱 - $223.3K vs $2.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Letterboxd undercuts at $1.58/mo vs $8.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Letterboxd has ~9.7M lifetime installs vs QQ邮箱's ~36K - 266.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Letterboxd sits at 4.82★ vs 3.56★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Letterboxd report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Letterboxd
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$223.3K
◀
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.68M
◀
$34.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.7M
◀
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.4M
◀
10K
App Store rating
4.82★
◀
3.56★
Total ratings
88K
◀
728
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.58
▶
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 15, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 134.6 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 4.12.3
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
Letterboxd trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Letterboxd or QQ邮箱? v
Letterboxd earns about $223.3K per month, while QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K. That is a 76.7× revenue gap (~$220.4K more per month for Letterboxd). Annual revenue: Letterboxd ≈ $2.68M/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Letterboxd or QQ邮箱? v
Letterboxd leads with about 9.7M estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 266.3× gap. Letterboxd's App Store downloads are estimated from 88K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 728 ratings.
Are Letterboxd and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
No - Letterboxd is in Social Networking and QQ邮箱 is in Productivity. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Letterboxd from social networking monetization patterns, QQ邮箱 from productivity.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Letterboxd and QQ邮箱 offer? v
Letterboxd: IAP range 3 tiers detected. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Letterboxd runs a "Subscription (~$1.58/mo)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Letterboxd or QQ邮箱? v
Letterboxd edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Letterboxd 88K ratings, QQ邮箱 728 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Letterboxd vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $223.3K for Letterboxd and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking / Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Letterboxd or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.