Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter vs adidas Running: Run tracker
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Lifesum AB
App Store
$550.0K/mo
~$6.60M/yr · 6.7M installs
VS
adidas Running: Run tracker
adidas
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 96.5M installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+54998500% vs other
Installs winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+1331% vs other
MAU winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+283% vs other
Rating winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+0% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 549985× more per month than adidas Running: Run tracker - $550.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs a $5.83/mo subscription that compounds; adidas Running: Run tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
vs
adidas Running: Run tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$550.0K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$6.60M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
6.7M
▶
96.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.9M
▶
7.4M
App Store rating
4.65★
◀
4.63★
Total ratings
150K
▶
1.7M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$5.83
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 250.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.11.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +8 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 12, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
adidas Running: Run tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns about $550.0K per month, while adidas Running: Run tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$550.0K more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.60M/year, adidas Running: Run tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
adidas Running: Run tracker leads with about 96.5M estimated downloads vs 6.7M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter - a 14.3× gap. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 150K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. adidas Running: Run tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and adidas Running: Run tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and adidas Running: Run tracker offer? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. adidas Running: Run tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; adidas Running: Run tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter 150K ratings, adidas Running: Run tracker 25K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter vs adidas Running: Run tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $550.0K for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and $0 for adidas Running: Run tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or adidas Running: Run tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.