Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing
App Store
$464/mo
~$5.6K/yr · 1K installs
VS
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Lifesum AB
App Store
$550.0K/mo
~$6.60M/yr · 6.7M installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+118439% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+490645% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+529243% vs other
Rating winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+29% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 1185× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $550.0K vs $464.
- Aggressive pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $5.83/mo vs $12.00/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter has ~6.7M lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~1K - 4907.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
vs
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$464
▶
$550.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.6K
▶
$6.60M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
6.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
367.125
▶
1.9M
App Store rating
3.60★
▶
4.65★
Total ratings
55
▶
150K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
◀
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 30, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- 105.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.54.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 250.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.11.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +8 more
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns about $550.0K per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $464. That is a 1185.4× revenue gap (~$549.6K more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $5.6K/year, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.60M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 6.7M estimated downloads vs 1K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 4907.5× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's App Store downloads are estimated from 55 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 150K ratings.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: no IAP detected on the public listing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 55 ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter 150K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $464 for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $550.0K for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.