Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Lifesum AB
App Store
$547.4K/mo
~$6.57M/yr · 6.7M installs
VS
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Kim Yunhoo
App Store
$1.1K/mo
~$13.3K/yr · 10K installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+49167% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+65735% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+73106% vs other
Rating winner
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins
+3% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 493× more per month than SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - $547.4K vs $1.1K.
- Premium pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter charges $5.83/mo vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter has ~6.7M lifetime installs vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's ~10K - 658.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs 5 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$547.4K
◀
$1.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$6.57M
◀
$13.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6.7M
◀
10K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.9M
◀
3K
App Store rating
4.65★
▶
4.78★
Total ratings
149K
◀
204
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$5.83
◀
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 5, 2019
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 227.7 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.9.1
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +8 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2019
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 88.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.302
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +5 more
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns about $547.4K per month, while SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $1.1K. That is a 492.7× revenue gap (~$546.3K more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.57M/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $13.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 6.7M estimated downloads vs 10K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - a 658.3× gap. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 149K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 204 ratings.
Are Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter 149K ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 204 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $547.4K for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter and $1.1K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.