MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker vs Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$93.8K/mo
~$1.13M/yr · 551K installs
VS

Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner

Fitbod
Google Play
$525.8K/mo
~$6.31M/yr · 4.2M installs
Revenue winner Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner wins +461% vs other
Installs winner Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner wins +662% vs other
MAU winner Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner wins +272% vs other
Rating winner MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins +8% vs other

Why Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner earns roughly 6× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $525.8K vs $93.8K.
  2. Premium pricing. Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner charges $36.04/mo vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner has ~4.2M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~551K - 7.6× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
vs
Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$93.8K
$525.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.13M
$6.31M
Lifetime installs (est.)
551K
4.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
161K
600K
App Store rating
4.86★
4.51★
Total ratings
16K
29K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
$36.04
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
0 tiers

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 19, 2017
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
174.2 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.1.590
Languages
English
View full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report →

Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner

Fitbod
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 22, 2020
Last updated
May 4, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
8.16.0-1
Languages
-
View full Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner report →

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker or Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner? v
Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner earns about $525.8K per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $93.8K. That is a 5.6× revenue gap (~$432.1K more per month for Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner). Annual revenue: MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.13M/year, Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner ≈ $6.31M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker or Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner? v
Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner leads with about 4.2M estimated downloads vs 551K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 7.6× gap. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker and Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker and Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner offer? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner: IAP range $9.99 - $129.99 per item. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner runs "Subscription (~$36.04/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker or Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 16K ratings, Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker vs Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $93.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker and $525.8K for Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker or Fitbod: Workout & Gym Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.