Marco Polo - Video Messenger vs WT Scan for Web - Dual Account
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
Joya Communications
App Store
$6.78M/mo
~$81.38M/yr · 365.9M installs
VS
WT Scan for Web - Dual Account
Jayshri Pipaliya
App Store
$7.0K/mo
~$84.6K/yr · 33K installs
Revenue winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+96152% vs other
Installs winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+1102125% vs other
MAU winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+181088% vs other
Rating winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+7% vs other
Why Marco Polo - Video Messenger is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns roughly 963× more per month than WT Scan for Web - Dual Account - $6.78M vs $7.0K.
- Premium pricing. Marco Polo - Video Messenger charges $19.99/mo vs WT Scan for Web - Dual Account's $14.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Marco Polo - Video Messenger has ~365.9M lifetime installs vs WT Scan for Web - Dual Account's ~33K - 11022.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Marco Polo - Video Messenger sits at 4.76★ vs 4.43★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Marco Polo - Video Messenger report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
vs
WT Scan for Web - Dual Account
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$6.78M
◀
$7.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$81.38M
◀
$84.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
365.9M
◀
33K
Monthly active users (est.)?
26.3M
◀
15K
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
4.43★
Total ratings
2.2M
◀
664
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 7, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 216.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 0.1581.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 14, 2024
- Last updated
- May 21, 2026
- File size
- 175.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.4.8
- Languages
- Arabic, Dutch, English, French, German, Hindi +6 more
Marco Polo - Video Messenger trajectory
WT Scan for Web - Dual Account trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or WT Scan for Web - Dual Account? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns about $6.78M per month, while WT Scan for Web - Dual Account earns about $7.0K. That is a 962.5× revenue gap (~$6.77M more per month for Marco Polo - Video Messenger). Annual revenue: Marco Polo - Video Messenger ≈ $81.38M/year, WT Scan for Web - Dual Account ≈ $84.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or WT Scan for Web - Dual Account? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger leads with about 365.9M estimated downloads vs 33K for WT Scan for Web - Dual Account - a 11022.2× gap. Marco Polo - Video Messenger's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.2M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WT Scan for Web - Dual Account's App Store downloads are estimated from 663 ratings.
Are Marco Polo - Video Messenger and WT Scan for Web - Dual Account in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social Networking category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Marco Polo - Video Messenger and WT Scan for Web - Dual Account offer? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger: IAP range 4 tiers detected. WT Scan for Web - Dual Account: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Marco Polo - Video Messenger runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)" monetization model; WT Scan for Web - Dual Account runs "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Marco Polo - Video Messenger or WT Scan for Web - Dual Account? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Marco Polo - Video Messenger 2.2M ratings, WT Scan for Web - Dual Account 663 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Marco Polo - Video Messenger vs WT Scan for Web - Dual Account revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $6.78M for Marco Polo - Video Messenger and $7.0K for WT Scan for Web - Dual Account are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Marco Polo - Video Messenger or WT Scan for Web - Dual Account to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.