Android Widgets (Material U) vs Pix Material Expressive Icons
Android Widgets (Material U)
Dita Cristian Ionut
Google Play
$1.4K/mo
~$16.4K/yr · 280K installs
VS
Pix Material Expressive Icons
PashaPuma Design
Google Play
$562/mo
~$6.7K/yr · 31K installs
Revenue winner
Android Widgets (Material U) wins
+144% vs other
Installs winner
Android Widgets (Material U) wins
+790% vs other
MAU winner
Android Widgets (Material U) wins
+560% vs other
Rating winner
Pix Material Expressive Icons wins
+4% vs other
Why Android Widgets (Material U) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Android Widgets (Material U) earns roughly 2× more per month than Pix Material Expressive Icons - $1.4K vs $562.
- Aggressive pricing. Android Widgets (Material U) undercuts at $1.40/mo vs $2.21/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Android Widgets (Material U) has ~280K lifetime installs vs Pix Material Expressive Icons's ~31K - 8.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Android Widgets (Material U) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Android Widgets (Material U)
vs
Pix Material Expressive Icons
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.4K
◀
$562
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.4K
◀
$6.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
280K
◀
31K
Monthly active users (est.)?
24K
◀
4K
App Store rating
4.27★
▶
4.45★
Total ratings
3K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.40
▶
$2.21
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 19, 2021
- Last updated
- Oct 6, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.3.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Sep 5, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 11.7.8.Build
- Languages
- -
Android Widgets (Material U) trajectory
Pix Material Expressive Icons trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Android Widgets (Material U) or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Android Widgets (Material U) earns about $1.4K per month, while Pix Material Expressive Icons earns about $562. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$807 more per month for Android Widgets (Material U)). Annual revenue: Android Widgets (Material U) ≈ $16.4K/year, Pix Material Expressive Icons ≈ $6.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Android Widgets (Material U) or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Android Widgets (Material U) leads with about 280K estimated downloads vs 31K for Pix Material Expressive Icons - a 8.9× gap. Android Widgets (Material U) reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Pix Material Expressive Icons reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Android Widgets (Material U) and Pix Material Expressive Icons in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Android Widgets (Material U) and Pix Material Expressive Icons offer? v
Android Widgets (Material U): IAP range $0.99 - $1.99 per item. Pix Material Expressive Icons: IAP range $0.49 - $9.99 per item. Android Widgets (Material U) runs a "Subscription (~$1.40/mo)" monetization model; Pix Material Expressive Icons runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Android Widgets (Material U) or Pix Material Expressive Icons? v
Pix Material Expressive Icons edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Android Widgets (Material U) 77 ratings, Pix Material Expressive Icons 83 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Android Widgets (Material U) vs Pix Material Expressive Icons revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.4K for Android Widgets (Material U) and $562 for Pix Material Expressive Icons are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Android Widgets (Material U) or Pix Material Expressive Icons to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.