麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Applebee's
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 600K installs
VS
Applebee's
Applebee's
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.7M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Applebee's wins
+521% vs other
MAU winner
Applebee's wins
+197% vs other
Rating winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+17% vs other
Why 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 sits at 4.84★ vs 4.13★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
vs
Applebee's
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
600K
▶
3.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
▶
212K
App Store rating
4.84★
◀
4.13★
Total ratings
7K
▶
41K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 25, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- 126.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.0.36.1
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 2, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.5.31
- Languages
- -
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory
Applebee's trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Applebee's? v
Applebee's earns about $0 per month, while 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year, Applebee's ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Applebee's? v
Applebee's leads with about 3.7M estimated downloads vs 600K for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 - a 6.2× gap. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Applebee's reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Applebee's in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and Applebee's have in-app purchases? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Applebee's does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Applebee's runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Applebee's? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings, Applebee's 13K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 vs Applebee's revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 and $0 for Applebee's are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 or Applebee's to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.